There are different taxonomies, frameworks, and otherwise, that people have created to make sense of some universal notion of knowledge-types. These include: * Bloom's taxonomy * Knowledge, learning and instruction framework [[@koedingerKnowledgeLearningInstruction2012 | (Koedinger et al. 2012)]] Some different types of knowledge (I will organise later, as these are neither disjoint nor fully-representative): * Declarative / Propositional * [[Spaced repetition]] seems to be very effective * Procedural * Conceptual * Explicit * Formally written, such as course specifications * Implicit * Not formally documented, but can be captured * [[Situated learning]] * Tacit * Too difficult to meaningfully articulate/operationalise * Develop through practice, and observations * Many motor-related skills, such as riding a bike * [[Situated learning]] * Meta-cognitive * Self-awareness, identifying what you don't know * [[Reflection]] * Patters of operation and feeling * [[Virtue|Virtues]] --- TODO: * definitions for knowledge * note some issues with prior taxonomies (Bloom's taxonomy) * talk about the value-laden nature of ranking knowledge